There is little point in an academic debate over definitions when something needs doing about vulnerable workers rather than arguing about them. The TUC’s initiative nationally and in it’s Regions has provided a major impetus to highlighting a significant problem and in finally pushing the Government into action in providing equivalent rights for Agency workers. The wide-ranging evidence and analysis that it presents goes a long way towards reminding us as individuals and trade unionists of the amount of work that still needs doing. We can only add weight to the argument from our own analyses of vulnerability and migrant workers in the North of England. However, as trade unions get on with the job of working together to protect vulnerable workers we would argue it is worth pausing for at least a moment to reflect on how we define our terms because being clear in our analysis is a protection from all those who claim ‘exaggeration’ or argue that some workers are not vulnerable after all. Equally importantly, sound policy making in our unions and beyond depends on sound analysis in the first place. Finally, being precise in our approach can tell us what we don’t know as well as what we do.

 Please click here to read article in full

Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)